Is Boy George natures condom?

Nobody really knows what causes homosexuality. No "gay" gene has been discovered yet there have been a lot of studies that suggest it does lie within a person biology. We do know it's natural because we can observe it in the wild.  So what if homosexuality was an evolutionary development for population control. Heterosexuality was originally an evolutionary development from asexual species. 

The obvious problem is that evolution is about surviving and reproducing. So this would be anti evolution, unless it somehow helped the family as a whole.

Since gay relatives have no kids of there own, they could be very helpful in tending to relatives kids. A better teacher to student ratio increases the likeliness that that group will be successful and survive. Studies also show that female relatives of gay men tend to have more children than the average female. This suggests that women who carry the fertile gene, may also carry the homosexual gene. Since after generations of high fertility, it would be increasingly difficult to provide and tend to the growing families without such help. This is were a homosexual relative would be very useful. On the same note, a homosexual lack of offspring would  be very useful in reducing the extended family size. This could be a key to survival in many scenarios including the famine. Over population means less resources. Studies also explain that gay uncles tend to help out more than straight uncles. Ultimately it would be extremely beneficial if women who carried the high fertility gene also carried the gay gene.










With almost 7,000,000,000 people in the world, I say we roll out the rainbow carpet and welcome them.